/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) educational technology (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: educational technology
Is in goldstandard
Evaluando al candidato educational technology:
educational technology
Lengua:
Frec: 59
Docs: 34
Nombre propio: / 59 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.145 = ( + (1+0) / (1+5.90689059560852)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| educational technology |
: 21. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competencies for online teaching: a special report. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 65-72 : 22. Jonassen, D. H. y Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35-51. : 24. Glynn, S. (1978). Capturing reader's attention by means of typographical cueing strategies. Educational Technology, 18, 7-12. : 26. Jonassen, D., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35–51. : 49. Rickards, J. P. (1980). Notetaking, underlining, inserted questions, and organizers in text: Research conclusions and educational implications. Educational Technology, 20(6), 5-11. : 52. Seki, U. (1997). Effects of Itemization and Highlighting Key Words on Text Comprehension. Journal of Japan Society for Educational Technology, 21, 17-20. : 58. Uosaki, Y., Itoh, H., and Nojima E. (2003). Effectiveness of Underlining the Texts on Readers' Comprehension. Journal of Japan Society for Educational Technology, 26(4), 349-359. : Bahrani, T., & Sim, T. S. (Octubre de 2012). Audiovisual news, cartoons, and films as sources of authentic language input and language proficiency enhancement. Obtenido de TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology: [81]http://www.tojet.net/articles/v11i4/1145.pdf : Bennett, Sue, Maton, Karl, y Kervin, Lisa. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. : Choy, S. O., & Ng, K. C. (2007). Implementing wiki software for supplementing online learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 209-226. : Chuang, M. H. & She, H. C. (2013). Fostering 5th grade students' understanding of science via salience analogical reasoning in on-line and classroom learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 102-118. : Clark, R. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29. : Collins, J. L., Cook-Cottone, C. P., Robinson, J. S. & Sullivan, R. R. (2004). Technology and new directions in professional development. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 33, 131-146. : Debuse, J. C. W., Lawley, M. & Shibl, R. (2008). Educators' perceptions of automated feedback systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 374-386. : Efe, R. (2011). Science student teachers and educational technology: Experience, intentions, and value. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 228-240. : Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 25-39. : Heinze, A. & Heinze, B. (2009). Blended e-learning skeleton of conversation: Improving formative assessment in undergraduate dissertation supervision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 294-305. : Huang, H. C. y Eskey, D. E. (1999). The effects of closed-captioned television on the listening comprehension of intermediate English as a second language (ESL) students. Journal of Educational Technology Sustems, 28(1), 75-96. [218]https://doi.org/10.2190/rg06-lywb-216y-r27g : Jonassen, D. & Bosung, K. (2010). Arguing to Learn and Learning to Argue: Design Justifications and Guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 439-457. : Kirkgoz, Y. (2011). A blended learning study on implementing video recorded speaking tasks in task-based classroom instruction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 10(4), 1-13. : Kong, S. C., Shroff, R. H. & Hung, H. K. (2009). A web enabled video system for self reflection by student teachers using a guiding framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 544-558. : Koolstra, C. M. y Beentjes, J. W. J. (1999). Children’s vocabulary acquisition in a foreign language through watching subtitled television programmes at home. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(1), 51-60. [230]https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299476 : Kopcha, T. J. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(2), 175- 190. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9095-4 : Li, X., Chu, S. K. W., Ki, W. W. y Woo, M. M. (2012). Using a wiki-based collaborative process writing pedagogy to facilitate collaborative writing among Chinese primary school students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology , 28(1), 159-181. : Markham, P. (1989). The effects of captioned videotapes on the listening comprehension of beginning, intermediate, and advanced ESL students. Educational Technology, 29(10), 38-41. : Motteram, G. (2006). Blended education and the transformation of teachers: a long-term case study in postgraduate UK education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 17-30. : Pho, P. (2008). Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics and Educational Technology: A Study of Linguistic Realizations of Rhetorical Structure and Authorial Stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250. : Pho, P. (2013). Authorial stance in research articles: Examples from ap- plied linguistics and educational technology. London: Palgrave Macmillan. : Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250. : Pho, P. D. (2013). Authorial stance in research articles: Examples from applied linguistics and educational technology. uk: Palgrave Macmillan. [169]https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032782 : Seels, B. (1994). Visual literacy: The Definition Problem. In Moore D.M. & Dwyer F. (Eds.) Visual literacy: A Spectrum of Visual Learning. Englewood Clifts, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. : Sharan, S., & Sharan, Y. (1976). Small-Group Teaching. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications. : Shih, R. C. (2011). Can Web 2.0 assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 829-845. : Shin, C. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a second language students. National Pingtung University of Science and Technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. : Sugar, W., Crawley, F., & Fine, B. (2004). Examining teachers' decisions to adopt new technology. Educational Technology and Society, 7(4), 201-213. : Tripp, T. & Rich, P. (2012a). Using video to analyze one’s own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 678-704. : Wileman, R. E. (1993). Visual communicating. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications. |